Duration & Credit Pulse
Executive Summary
Bottom Line: Hot inflation data shattered rate cut hopes as January CPI surged 0.5% monthly—the highest since August 2023—while Trump’s steel tariffs and China’s energy retaliation created a toxic stagflationary cocktail. The modest Treasury rally and credit spread tightening belie deeper structural concerns: with inflation re-accelerating, trade wars escalating, and fiscal deficits ballooning, fixed income markets face a regime change requiring entirely new analytical frameworks where political risk dominates traditional metrics.
Duration Dashboard
Maturity | February 9, 2025 | February 16, 2025 | Weekly Δ | 5-Year Percentile |
---|---|---|---|---|
2‑Year | 4.29% | 4.26% | -3 bp | 71st %ile (elevated) |
5‑Year | 4.35% | 4.33% | -2 bp | 85th %ile (high) |
10‑Year | 4.50% | 4.48% | -2 bp | 88th %ile (extreme) |
30‑Year | 4.69% | 4.70% | +0 bp | 91st %ile (extreme) |
Inflation Shock Meets Modest Treasury Rally
Curve Analysis: Treasury markets delivered a puzzling response to the week’s inflation shock, with yields declining modestly despite CPI’s alarming surge. The 2-5 year sector led the rally with 2-3 basis point declines, while the 30-year remained unchanged—creating a subtle bull steepening. This counterintuitive reaction suggests either extreme positioning unwinding after the prior week’s selloff or growing conviction that aggressive Fed tightening will ultimately break the economy. With yields still at extreme historical percentiles (88th-91st), the modest rally barely dents the backup since December.
The Treasury market’s muted response to explosive inflation data revealed deep cross-currents beneath the surface. Despite January CPI’s 0.5% monthly surge shocking consensus, yields declined modestly across the curve with the 2-year down 3 basis points to 4.26%. This paradoxical rally likely reflected technical factors—hedge funds covering massive short positions ahead of Presidents Day weekend—rather than fundamental reassessment. The persistence of extreme yield percentiles across all maturities (71st-91st percentile) underscores that we remain in historically restrictive territory, with the 10-year at 4.48% still well above levels that have historically triggered economic stress.
Credit Pulse
Metric | February 9, 2025 | February 16, 2025 | Weekly Δ | 5-Year Percentile |
---|---|---|---|---|
IG OAS | 78 bp | 76 bp | -2 bp | 15th %ile (very tight) |
HY OAS | 276 bp | 271 bp | -5 bp | 8th %ile (extremely tight) |
VIX Index | 16.54 | 14.77 | -1.77 | 25th %ile (low) |
Credit markets displayed remarkable complacency in the face of mounting macro risks, with spreads tightening across the board. Investment grade spreads compressed 2 basis points to just 76bp—placing them at the 15th percentile of their 5-year range—while high yield tightened 5bp to an eye-watering 271bp (8th percentile). The VIX’s decline to 14.77 suggests options markets see no immediate stress, despite inflation shocks and trade war escalation. This extreme spread compression amid deteriorating fundamentals creates a dangerous asymmetry: massive downside risk for minimal carry compensation. The last time spreads were this tight amid similar macro uncertainty was February 2020—weeks before pandemic volatility exploded.
US Macroeconomic Assessment – Inflation Shock Meets Trade War Reality
The week of February 9-16 marked a critical inflection point as persistently hot inflation collided with escalating trade tensions, forcing a fundamental reassessment of the economic outlook. Tuesday’s CPI release delivered the kind of upside surprise markets had grown unaccustomed to: headline inflation surged 0.5% monthly with core up 0.4%, both exceeding even the highest Street estimates. The breadth of price pressures proved particularly alarming—shelter contributed 0.26 percentage points, egg prices soared 15.2% on avian flu impacts, and critically, services ex-housing jumped 0.8% signaling entrenched wage-price dynamics.
Trade war escalation compounds inflation pressures: President Trump’s February 10 announcement of 25% steel and aluminum tariffs—eliminating hundreds of exemptions—triggered immediate retaliation. China’s response came within 24 hours: 15% tariffs on U.S. LNG and coal, 10% on crude oil, plus expanded export controls on critical minerals. The timing couldn’t be worse—layering supply-side inflation atop already-hot demand conditions creates 1970s-style stagflation risks. Natural gas prices spiked to $4.10/MMBtu while steel futures surged, feeding directly into core goods inflation.
Fed caught in impossible position: Chair Powell’s Congressional testimony revealed a central bank struggling to adapt its framework to the new reality. His acknowledgment that tariffs create “upward pressure on inflation” while potentially slowing growth epitomizes the policy dilemma. Markets immediately repriced: CME FedWatch showed 2025 rate cut probability collapsing from 75% to just 35%, with some dealers beginning to price hiking risk for H2 2025. The Fed’s challenge is distinguishing one-time price level effects from persistent inflation—made impossible when tariffs keep ratcheting higher.
Consumer confidence craters as real wages turn negative: The University of Michigan survey plunged to 52—worse than 2008 levels—as consumers grappled with accelerating prices and policy chaos. With January CPI at 3.0% year-over-year and wage growth at 4.1%, the modest real wage gains that sustained spending are evaporating. Retail sales data next week will reveal whether sentiment weakness has translated to actual spending pullback. Early credit card data suggests consumers are maintaining nominal spending by depleting savings—an unsustainable dynamic.
Federal Reserve Policy Outlook
The Federal Reserve faces its most complex challenge since the Volcker era: fighting resurgent inflation while trade wars threaten growth and fiscal dominance limits policy flexibility. This week’s data demolished market expectations for 2025 rate cuts, with futures now pricing extended pause through year-end and growing risk of additional hikes if inflation accelerates. The January CPI details were particularly troubling for the Fed—”supercore” services inflation at 0.8% monthly annualizes to nearly 10%, far above levels consistent with 2% target.
Powell’s testimony revealed subtle but important shifts in Fed thinking. His emphasis on “patience” and data dependence masks deeper concerns about policy credibility. Having declared victory too early in 2023, the Fed cannot afford another premature pivot. Yet with real rates already restrictive and trade wars threatening demand destruction, aggressive tightening risks overkill. The committee appears to be coalescing around an extended hold at 4.25%-4.50%, hoping restriction works with a lag while maintaining optionality. But if March CPI shows continued acceleration—particularly if tariff pass-through becomes evident—the Fed may face the unthinkable: resuming hikes just as recession risks mount.
Week Ahead: Data Deluge Meets Trade Tensions
- Retail Sales (February 20): January data takes on heightened importance given consumer confidence collapse. Consensus expects tepid 0.2% gain, but tariff front-running could create upside surprise. Watch control group for underlying demand trends.
- FOMC Minutes (February 21): January meeting minutes will reveal depth of Fed’s inflation concerns pre-CPI shock. Focus on any discussion of resuming hikes and views on neutral rate in new environment.
- Existing Home Sales (February 22): Housing market response to 4.5%+ mortgages becomes critical for Fed’s wealth effect transmission. Inventory dynamics key for shelter inflation outlook.
- Trade negotiations intensify: March 4 deadline for Canada/Mexico tariffs looms with negotiations stalled. Corporate America mobilizing against steel tariffs while China considers rare earth export bans.
US Economic Positioning and Global Context
The United States enters unprecedented territory with inflationary pressures building just as policy tools become constrained. The combination of fiscal deficits approaching 7% of GDP, resurgent inflation requiring restrictive monetary policy, and trade wars disrupting supply chains creates a policy trilemma with no good solutions. Traditional economic relationships are breaking down—the Phillips Curve steepening, Treasury correlation with risk assets flipping, and dollar strength persisting despite twin deficits.
Global implications accelerate: International markets are positioning for sustained U.S. inflation and policy divergence. European yields remain anchored by ECB easing while Treasury yields push toward 5%, creating the widest Atlantic spread in decades. China’s measured retaliation—targeting energy rather than Treasuries—suggests Beijing is playing the long game, willing to endure short-term pain while America potentially inflates away its competitive advantages. For fixed income investors, this environment demands fundamental rethinking: when your own government becomes the primary source of volatility, when inflation protection matters more than credit quality, and when political risk dominates economic fundamentals, traditional frameworks offer little guidance. The modest Treasury rally this week amid shocking inflation data may prove to be the last gift for those still believing in the old regime—use it wisely.
Key Articles of the Week
-
US CPI Report January 2025: Live Data on Inflation, Consumer Price Index NewsBloombergFebruary 12, 2025Read Article
-
Fed’s Powell, quizzed about trade, Musk, and bank safety, says economy is fineReutersFebruary 11, 2025Read Article
-
China retaliates with additional tariffs of up to 15% on select U.S. imports starting Feb. 10CNBCFebruary 4, 2025Read Article
-
China tariff retaliation targets its modest US energy importsReutersFebruary 4, 2025Read Article
-
PPI report January 2025: Prices rose 0.4%CNBCFebruary 13, 2025Read Article
-
Key takeaways from Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s congressional hearingCNN BusinessFebruary 11, 2025Read Article
-
China retaliates with tariffs on US goods after Trump’s moveAl JazeeraFebruary 4, 2025Read Article
-
Report to the Secretary of the Treasury from the Treasury Borrowing Advisory CommitteeU.S. Department of the TreasuryFebruary 2025Read Article