Duration & Credit Pulse: September 14, 2025

Jobless Claims 263,000: Fed Pivot Imminent as Labor Market Cracks | Duration & Credit Pulse - September 14, 2025

Duration & Credit Pulse

Week Ending September 14, 2025

Executive Summary

Bottom Line: Jobless claims surging to 263,000—the highest since October 2021—definitively shifted the Federal Reserve narrative from inflation vigilance to employment rescue, with markets pricing 100% probability of rate cuts at the September 17 meeting. The week's data dichotomy proved stark: August CPI accelerated to 2.9% year-over-year while PPI unexpectedly declined 0.1%, but labor market deterioration trumped all inflation concerns as Treasury yields declined across the curve and credit spreads compressed to generational lows at just the 2nd percentile for investment grade—the tightest levels since 1997.

Duration Dashboard: Jobless Claims Drive Yield Compression

MaturitySept 5, 2025Sept 12, 2025Weekly Δ5-Year Percentile
2‑Year 3.51% 3.56% +5 bp 40th %ile (middle range)
5‑Year 3.58% 3.63% +5 bp 47th %ile (middle range)
10‑Year 4.08% 4.07% -1 bp 64th %ile (middle range)
30‑Year 4.76% 4.68% -8 bp 84th %ile (elevated)

Bull Flattening as Fed Pivot Looms

3.4% 3.7% 4.0% 4.3% 4.6% 2Y 5Y 10Y 30Y Employment Weakness Drives Bull Flattening 3.56% 3.63% 4.07% 4.68% Sept 5, 2025 Sept 12, 2025

Curve Analysis: The Treasury curve exhibited classic bull flattening behavior as jobless claims data overwhelmed inflation concerns, with the 2s30s spread compressing to 112 basis points from 125 basis points the prior week. The modest 5bp rise in 2-year yields reflected residual inflation worries from the 2.9% CPI print, but longer-duration bonds rallied decisively on recession fears. The 10-year's approach to 4.00% intraday marked a critical psychological level, with buying emerging from both foreign central banks and domestic pension funds anticipating the Fed's pivot to easing.

The week's Treasury market action crystallized around two pivotal data releases that painted opposite pictures of the economy. Wednesday's unexpected PPI decline of 0.1% initially sparked a duration rally, with yields moving lower before Thursday's CPI acceleration to 2.9% year-over-year partially reversed gains. Yet the true market mover came with Thursday's jobless claims explosion to 263,000, immediately shifting the narrative from "higher for longer" to "employment emergency." The 30-year bond's 8 basis point weekly decline despite remaining at the 84th percentile of its 5-year range suggests investors see the Fed pivot as insufficient to prevent economic deterioration.

Historic Employment Revision Shatters Fed Credibility: The September 9 revelation that March 2024-March 2025 employment was significantly overstated in a massive downward revision represents one of the largest corrections in Bureau of Labor Statistics history. This means the Federal Reserve has been setting policy based on phantom job growth for six months, maintaining restrictive rates while the labor market deteriorated far more severely than reported. The revision—equivalent to erasing entire cities worth of employment—reveals that what appeared as resilient job growth was actually far weaker than initially reported. This data disaster arrives precisely as jobless claims hit 263,000, confirming the Fed has already waited too long to ease.
Labor Market Collapse Trumps Inflation Persistence: The 263,000 jobless claims print shattered any remaining hawkish Fed scenarios, representing not just the highest reading since October 2021 but arriving alongside the devastating employment revision. Markets immediately repriced for an extended easing cycle, with fed funds futures indicating expectations for significant cuts through year-end 2025. The stark divergence between front-end yields rising modestly while long bonds rallied suggests traders expect the Fed's response will prove too little, too late to prevent recession. Foreign holders maintaining substantial Treasury positions provided crucial support as the market absorbed this fundamental regime shift.

Credit Pulse: Historic Compression Despite Deteriorating Fundamentals

MetricSept 5, 2025Sept 12, 2025Weekly Δ5-Year Percentile
IG OAS 74 bp 69 bp -5 bp 2nd %ile (extremely tight)
HY OAS 259 bp 258 bp -1 bp 10th %ile (low)
VIX Index 15.18 14.76 -0.42 18th %ile (low)

Credit markets entered uncharted territory with investment grade spreads compressing to just 69 basis points—the 2nd percentile of the 5-year range and approaching the tightest levels since 1997. This historic compression occurred despite clear evidence of deteriorating economic fundamentals, with ISM Services employment at 46.5 and Manufacturing employment at 43.8, both deep in contraction territory. The disconnect between spread levels and underlying economic reality reached extreme proportions, with high yield's 10th percentile ranking offering virtually no cushion for the earnings disappointments that labor market weakness typically presages.

Credit's Dangerous Complacency at 27-Year Extremes: Investment grade spreads at the 2nd percentile represent a catastrophic mispricing of risk as unemployment claims surge and employment data collapses. The technical flows from money market funds have created conditions divorced from fundamentals, with new issue books showing heavy oversubscription despite deteriorating corporate profitability outlooks. VIX at just 14.76 suggests options markets share credit's complacency, but history shows such extreme spread compression immediately preceding Fed easing cycles often marks the final euphoria before violent repricing. The 5bp tightening in IG spreads the same week jobless claims hit 263,000 may represent peak irrationality—spreads haven't been this tight since 1997, just before the Asian Financial Crisis triggered widespread credit distress.

US Macroeconomic Assessment – Labor Market Deterioration Forces Fed Pivot

The week of September 7-14 delivered unambiguous evidence that the U.S. labor market had reached an inflection point, with multiple data points converging to paint a picture of rapid deterioration that overwhelmed any lingering inflation concerns. Thursday's jobless claims surge to 263,000 crushed consensus expectations of 235,000 and marked the highest reading since the pandemic recovery period of October 2021. This shocking deterioration gained additional weight from the Bureau of Labor Statistics' September 9 announcement revising March 2024-March 2025 payroll growth down by 911,000 jobs—one of the largest negative revisions in history.

Employment weakness proves broad-based: The jobless claims spike represented just one facet of comprehensive labor market softening. ISM Services came in at 52.0 with employment remaining in contraction for the third consecutive month, while Manufacturing PMI at 48.7 marked its sixth straight month below 50, suggesting layoffs extending well beyond interest-sensitive sectors. August's ADP report showed private payrolls adding just 54,000 jobs versus 75,000 expected, the weakest reading outside recessions. The convergence of forward-looking employment indicators pointed to September's official jobs report likely showing further deterioration, effectively forcing the Fed's hand regardless of inflation dynamics.

Inflation dichotomy complicates policy response: Wednesday's Producer Price Index delivered an unexpectedly dovish -0.1% monthly decline, with core PPI also falling 0.1%, suggesting pipeline price pressures had peaked. Markets initially celebrated this "goldilocks" combination of cooling inflation with still-positive growth. Yet Thursday's Consumer Price Index told a different story, with headline inflation accelerating to 2.9% year-over-year from 2.6% in July. Core CPI's 0.3% monthly increase pushed the annual rate to 3.1%, uncomfortably above the Fed's 2% target. The acceleration stemmed from persistent shelter costs (+0.4%), surging food prices (+0.5%), and energy jumping 0.7% with gasoline up 1.9% monthly.

Tariff distortions create structural inflation floor: The inflation persistence reflected deeper structural issues beyond the Fed's control. With U.S. tariff policies creating the most restrictive trade environment since the 1930s, import price pressures remained embedded despite broader economic softening. ISM surveys indicated price indices remained elevated, with multiple respondents explicitly citing tariff pass-through effects. This created an impossible trinity for monetary policy: fighting structurally higher inflation from trade policy while addressing cyclical employment weakness and maintaining financial stability.

Federal Reserve Policy Outlook: Emergency Pivot Despite Inflation

The Federal Reserve entered its pre-FOMC blackout period on September 7 facing the clearest policy imperative since the pandemic: abandon the inflation fight to address collapsing employment. Markets moved decisively to price this pivot, with fed funds futures showing near-certainty of a cut at the September 17 meeting, with debate centered on whether the Fed would deliver 25 or 50 basis points. The week's data flow—particularly the 263,000 jobless claims—essentially eliminated any possibility of the Fed maintaining its pause, regardless of the 2.9% CPI reading.

The technical backdrop strongly supported easing, with the September 10 auction of 10-year notes reportedly drawing strong demand with robust foreign participation. This suggested foreign central banks remained comfortable with U.S. duration despite the impending easing cycle. Corporate credit issuance remained heavy throughout the week, indicating healthy capital markets functionality, while the combination of strong technicals and deteriorating fundamentals gave the Fed political cover for aggressive action despite above-target inflation.

The $7.6 Trillion Flow Tsunami: Money Markets Poised to Overwhelm Credit

The week's most underappreciated dynamic lies not in economic data but in the staggering $7.6 trillion parked in money market funds awaiting the Fed's first rate cut. This cash hoard—accumulated during two years of 5%+ yields—represents nearly three times the entire U.S. high yield market and exceeds the combined market value of investment grade corporates trading below 100. History suggests these flows can move significantly once cuts begin: the 2019 Fed pivot triggered substantial money market outflows within six months, and current positioning dwarfs those levels by nearly an order of magnitude.

The technical implications proved visible throughout the week as investment grade new issuance met insatiable demand. Books routinely closed with heavy oversubscription and pricing consistently through initial guidance, suggesting institutional investors are front-running the anticipated money market exodus. Japanese banks led the charge with significant dollar-denominated bond issuance at spreads that would have been unthinkable just months ago. The compression to 69 basis points for investment grade—the 2nd percentile of the 5-year range—reflects not fundamental value but rather a technical squeeze as too much money chases too few bonds.

Flow Dynamics Trump Fundamentals at Dangerous Extremes: The $7.6 trillion in money markets represents an enormous portion of total U.S. bond market capitalization, creating unprecedented technical pressure once yields begin declining. If even a modest portion of these funds rotate into credit—as occurred during the 2019-2020 cycle—the impact on the much smaller high yield market would be dramatic. This mathematical reality explains why credit spreads remain at historic tights despite 263,000 jobless claims and deteriorating ISM indices. The violent spread widening will only occur once these flows reverse, likely after the Fed has cut rates enough to make money market yields unattractive versus duration risk. Until then, the technical bid overwhelms any fundamental deterioration.

Week Ahead: Fed Decision Amid Employment Crisis

  • FOMC Meeting (Sept 17-18): Fed expected to cut 25bp to 4.00-4.25% with potential for 50bp if employment data deteriorates further. Updated dot plot likely shows 3-4 cuts in 2025.
  • Retail Sales (Sept 17): August data critical for consumer health assessment. Consensus -0.3% m/m as labor market weakness filters through to spending.
  • Housing Starts (Sept 18): August starts expected to show continued weakness with 30-year mortgage rates above 7% crushing affordability.
  • Bank of Japan Decision (Sept 18-19): BOJ expected to hold at 0.5% while announcing ETF sales, maintaining gradual normalization path.
  • UK CPI (Sept 18): August inflation data crucial for Bank of England's October decision after surprising August rate cut to 4.0%.

US Economic Positioning: Fed Pivot Arrives Too Late

America's economic trajectory shifted decisively during the week of September 7-14 from "soft landing" hopes to recession reality, with the 263,000 jobless claims serving as the clarion call that forced the Federal Reserve's hand. The labor market deterioration proved particularly troubling given its breadth—spanning services, manufacturing, and even typically resilient sectors—suggesting monetary policy tightening had finally broken through with a vengeance. Yet with inflation still running at 2.9% annually and credit spreads at historic tights, the Fed faces an impossible balancing act.

Global divergence highlights U.S. vulnerability: The European Central Bank's September 11 decision to hold rates steady despite accelerating growth projections underscored how U.S. economic weakness had become an outlier among developed markets. While ECB President Lagarde maintained optionality, the unanimous vote suggested comfort with restrictive policy even as the Fed prepared to ease. This policy divergence, combined with the Bank of Japan's gradual normalization and Bank of England's measured approach, positioned the dollar for potential weakness despite its haven status. For fixed income investors, the combination of Fed easing, persistent inflation, and credit spreads at 27-year tights created a uniquely dangerous cocktail. The bull flattening in Treasuries suggested markets expected the Fed's response to prove insufficient, while credit's refusal to widen despite deteriorating fundamentals represented the last vestige of the everything bubble—sustained purely by technical flows rather than economic reality. As the Fed prepared to deliver its first cut in nearly a year, the question wasn't whether policy had pivoted too late, but rather how severe the economic downturn would become before monetary accommodation could gain traction.

Frequently Asked Questions - September 2025 Fed Meeting

Why did jobless claims spike to 263,000 in September 2025?

The surge to 263,000 initial unemployment claims, the highest since October 2021, reflected broad-based labor market weakness across manufacturing, services, and technology sectors. Combined with the massive downward revision to prior employment data announced September 9, this indicated that earlier job growth had been significantly overstated and the economy was weakening faster than previously recognized.

How did the Fed respond to 2.9% inflation versus deteriorating employment?

Despite CPI inflation accelerating to 2.9% year-over-year in August, the Fed prioritized the employment mandate given jobless claims at 263,000 and ISM employment indices in deep contraction. Markets priced 100% probability of a September 17 rate cut, with the debate centered on 25 versus 50 basis points rather than whether to cut at all.

What caused investment grade credit spreads to reach 2nd percentile levels?

The compression to just 69 basis points resulted from technical factors overwhelming fundamentals: $7.6 trillion in money market funds seeking yield, massive foreign demand, and new issue books consistently 4-5x oversubscribed. This occurred despite clear economic deterioration, creating a dangerous disconnect between spread levels and actual credit risk.

Why did Treasury yields show mixed movements with front-end rising but long-end falling?

The curve's bull flattening reflected different dynamics across maturities: 2-year yields rose 5bp on persistent inflation concerns from the 2.9% CPI, while 30-year yields fell 8bp on recession fears. This created a 2s30s spread compression from 125bp to 112bp, typical of late-cycle dynamics when markets expect Fed easing to prove insufficient.

Key Articles of the Week

  • Consumer Prices Rose at Annual Rate of 2.9% in August, Weekly Jobless Claims Jump to 263,000
    CNBC
    September 11, 2025
    Read Article
  • Producer Price Index Unexpectedly Declined 0.1% in August
    Bureau of Labor Statistics
    September 10, 2025
    Read Article
  • Treasury Yields Rise as Investors Weigh Inflation, Jobs Data
    CNBC
    September 12, 2025
    Read Article
  • European Central Bank Holds Rates at 2.0% in Unanimous Decision
    CNBC
    September 11, 2025
    Read Article
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics Announces Major Downward Employment Revision
    U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
    September 9, 2025
    Read Article
  • ISM Services PMI at 52.0 in August, Employment Index Remains in Contraction
    PR Newswire
    September 4, 2025
    Read Article
  • ISM Manufacturing PMI at 48.7, Sixth Consecutive Month of Contraction
    PR Newswire
    September 3, 2025
    Read Article
  • $7 Trillion Wall of Cash Looms as Fed Rate Cuts Begin
    CNBC
    September 12, 2025
    Read Article
Content Produced By:
Justin Taylor

Important Disclaimer

This report is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation to buy or sell any security, or a solicitation of any kind. The information contained herein is believed to be reliable but cannot be guaranteed as to its accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

The analysis and opinions expressed in this report are those of Mariemont Capital and are subject to change without notice. Market conditions, economic factors, and investment strategies evolve continuously, and the views expressed herein may not reflect current conditions or opinions at a later date.

No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the fairness, accuracy, completeness, or correctness of the information and opinions contained herein. Mariemont Capital and its affiliates, officers, directors, and employees may have positions in the securities mentioned in this report and may make purchases or sales while this report is in circulation.

Investing in fixed income securities involves risks, including interest rate risk, credit risk, inflation risk, reinvestment risk, and liquidity risk. The value of investments can go down as well as up, and investors may not get back the amount originally invested. This report should not be relied upon as the sole basis for investment decisions. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and consult with qualified financial, legal, and tax advisors before making any investment.

This report may not be reproduced, distributed, or published without the prior written consent of Mariemont Capital. By accessing this report, you acknowledge and agree to be bound by the terms of this disclaimer.

Sources: Available upon request to jt@mariemontcapital.com
Data extracted from public and private data sources.
© 2025 Mariemont Capital. All rights reserved.
Published: Sunday, September 14, 2025, 6:45 PM EST