Duration & Credit Pulse
Executive Summary
Bottom Line: Treasury yields posted their largest weekly increase since April 2025 as the U.S.-Israel military strikes on Iran and subsequent Strait of Hormuz disruption sent oil prices sharply higher, overwhelming the traditional safe-haven bid that geopolitical crises typically deliver to bonds. The 10-year yield rose 20 basis points to 4.14% even as Friday's February payrolls report showed a loss of 92,000 jobs—the first negative print in years—creating a textbook stagflationary signal that leaves the Federal Reserve with no clear policy path. The 5-year sector led the selloff at +23 basis points, reflecting aggressive repricing of the "higher for longer" rate trajectory, while the VIX reached the 94th percentile of its 5-year range at 29.49.
Treasury Yields March 2026: Duration Dashboard
| Maturity | March 1, 2026 | March 8, 2026 | Weekly Δ | 5-Year Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2‑Year | 3.38% | 3.56% | +19 bp | 38th %ile (middle range) |
| 5‑Year | 3.50% | 3.73% | +23 bp | 47th %ile (middle range) |
| 10‑Year | 3.94% | 4.14% | +20 bp | 63rd %ile (middle range) |
| 30‑Year | 4.61% | 4.76% | +15 bp | 83rd %ile (elevated) |
Oil-Driven Bear Shift With Belly Underperformance
Curve Analysis: The selloff was near-parallel through the 10-year maturity, with the 2s10s spread widening marginally to 58 basis points from 56bp the prior week. The 5-year sector's 23bp increase—the largest move on the curve—reflects intensive repricing of the Federal Reserve's medium-term policy path as oil-driven inflation expectations pushed against deteriorating labor data. The 30-year's comparatively restrained 15bp rise narrowed the 5s30s spread to 103bp from 111bp, suggesting long-end investors are assigning growing weight to the growth-dampening effects of both the oil shock and the tariff regime, partially offsetting inflation premium demands.
The week's market dynamics were dominated by the escalation of the U.S.-Israel military campaign against Iran that began February 28. By Monday's open, the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz—through which approximately 20% of global oil supply transits—had sent WTI crude from roughly $67 to above $80, with prices reaching $90.90 by Friday's close. The oil shock produced a counterintuitive Treasury response: rather than attracting safe-haven flows, bonds sold off as inflation expectations repriced sharply higher. The 2-year TIPS breakeven rose above 3.0% for the first time since April 2025, while the 10-year breakeven climbed to 2.35%, signaling that energy-driven price pressures are overriding the traditional flight-to-quality impulse.
As we detailed in our March 1 report, the 10-year had just broken below 4% on softening growth expectations. That level was reclaimed decisively this week, with yields rising 20bp to 4.14% in a move that largely reversed the prior month's rally. The speed of the reversal underscores the fragility of the rate-cut narrative when confronted with a supply-side inflation shock.
Iran Oil Shock and Stagflation: Credit Pulse
| Metric | March 1, 2026 | March 8, 2026 | Weekly Δ | 5-Year Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IG OAS | 83 bp | 79 bp | −4 bp | 34th %ile (moderate) |
| HY OAS | 277 bp | 281 bp | +4 bp | 30th %ile (moderate) |
| VIX Index | 19.86 | 29.49 | +9.63 | 94th %ile (extreme) |
Credit markets exhibited a quality rotation rather than broad-based stress, with investment grade spreads tightening 4bp to 79bp while high yield widened 4bp to 281bp. The IG compression likely reflects institutional flight-to-quality within credit—money rotating from lower-rated paper toward higher-grade corporates rather than exiting credit entirely. Both IG and HY remain near the lower third of their 5-year ranges (34th and 30th percentiles respectively), indicating that absolute spread levels have not yet adjusted to the new risk environment despite the dramatic increase in equity volatility.
The VIX's move to 29.49—its 94th percentile reading—represents the most significant divergence from credit spreads this year. As we noted following the January FOMC decision, markets had been pricing a benign outlook for credit even as policy uncertainty increased. That complacency is now being tested, though spreads themselves have yet to fully reflect the shift in risk regime.
US Macroeconomic Assessment – Stagflation Fears Intensify
The week's economic data painted a contradictory picture that reinforces the stagflationary narrative now confronting fixed income markets. Early releases showed manufacturing resilience, with Monday's ISM Manufacturing PMI printing at 52.4 versus 51.7 consensus—the second consecutive month of expansion. However, the prices paid subindex rose to 70.5 from 59.0, the highest reading since June 2022, driven by steel and aluminum tariff costs and pre-conflict energy price increases. Wednesday's ISM Services PMI at 56.1 versus 53.5 expected was the strongest reading since July 2022, with all ten reported indexes in expansion simultaneously for the first time since March 2021.
| Release | Date | Actual | Consensus | Prior |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISM Manufacturing PMI | Mon 3/2 | 52.4 | 51.7 | 52.6 |
| ISM Mfg Prices Paid | Mon 3/2 | 70.5 | — | 59.0 |
| ISM Services PMI | Wed 3/4 | 56.1 | 53.5 | 53.8 |
| ADP Employment | Wed 3/4 | +63K | +50K | +11K |
| Nonfarm Payrolls | Fri 3/6 | −92K | +58K | +126K |
| Unemployment Rate | Fri 3/6 | 4.4% | 4.3% | 4.3% |
| Avg Hourly Earnings (MoM) | Fri 3/6 | +0.4% | +0.3% | +0.3% |
Labor market weakness accelerated: ADP private payrolls on Wednesday showed 63,000 jobs added—better than the 50,000 consensus—but Friday's official BLS report delivered the week's most significant data point. February nonfarm payrolls declined by 92,000 against expectations of a 58,000 gain, the first negative monthly reading in years. A California physicians' strike accounted for roughly 37,000 of the healthcare sector's 28,000 decline (net of offsets), while the federal government shed 10,000, manufacturing lost 12,000, and transportation and warehousing dropped 11,000. The unemployment rate ticked up to 4.4% from 4.3%. Net downward revisions to December and January totaled 69,000, compounding the weakness. Average hourly earnings rose 0.4% month-over-month and 3.8% year-over-year, both above expectations—reinforcing the simultaneous deterioration in employment and persistence of wage pressures.
Tariff policy continued to evolve: Following the Supreme Court's February 20 decision striking down IEEPA-based tariffs (which we covered in our February 22 report), the administration pivoted to Section 122 authority. Treasury Secretary Bessent announced on March 4 that a new 15% global tariff would take effect that week, with plans to return to pre-ruling tariff levels via alternative legal mechanisms within five months. Twenty-four states filed suit to block the Section 122 tariff on March 5. Steel and aluminum tariffs at 25% and China-specific duties at 30% remained in place.
The Beige Book revealed a "bifurcated" economy: Released March 4, the report showed five of twelve Federal Reserve districts reporting flat or declining activity, while seven showed slight to moderate expansion. Nine of twelve districts flagged the new 15% tariff as a material cost driver. The report described a "low-hire/low-fire" labor market and what analysts have termed a K-shaped consumer dynamic, with lower-income households pulling back while higher-income households benefited from asset price appreciation—a pattern that the week's equity selloff and oil-driven cost increases may now be disrupting even at upper income levels.
Federal Reserve Policy Outlook
Federal Reserve officials entered the March 7 blackout period facing the most difficult policy calculus since the 2022 inflation episode. Kansas City Fed President Jeff Schmid delivered the week's most notable remarks on March 3, stating that inflation remains closer to 3% than the Fed's 2% target and warning that the central bank cannot afford to be complacent after nearly five years above target. He noted the economy created only 181,000 jobs in all of 2025—the slowest pace of job growth outside of a recession on record. Vice Chair Bowman's March 3 remarks focused narrowly on bank liquidity regulation rather than monetary policy.
Market pricing for the March 17-18 FOMC meeting shifted materially. The probability of a rate hold rose to 99.7% as traders recognized the Fed's paralysis between competing inflation and employment mandates. Pre-conflict, markets had priced two 25bp cuts in 2026 (June and September). By Friday, cut expectations had narrowed to at most one reduction in December, with the fed funds rate at 3.50-3.75% appearing likely to persist through most of the year. Goldman Sachs formally moved its next cut forecast from June to September. The upcoming FOMC meeting—which includes updated economic projections and dot plots—will provide the first official indication of how the Committee is processing the oil shock and labor market deterioration. As the Conference Board noted, the March meeting is fundamentally about navigating geopolitical risk without losing control of inflation expectations—a far more complex challenge than the rate-cut deliberations markets had anticipated entering the year, and a shift from the easing trajectory we discussed in our February 15 CPI analysis.
Week Ahead: FOMC Meeting Dominates a Heavy Calendar
- CPI Inflation (March 11): February CPI will be the first inflation reading to incorporate early tariff effects and pre-conflict energy pass-through. Core CPI consensus stands at 0.3% month-over-month; any upside surprise would cement the Fed's hawkish positioning heading into the March 18 decision.
- FOMC Meeting (March 17-18): The most closely watched meeting since the 2022 tightening cycle. Updated dot plots and economic projections will reveal whether the Committee is formally pricing stagflation risk. Chair Powell's press conference will be scrutinized for any indication of policy asymmetry between the inflation and employment mandates.
- Retail Sales (March 14): February data becomes a key read on consumer resilience given the oil price increase and weakening labor backdrop. Consensus expects modest softness, but the combination of front-loaded energy costs and deteriorating confidence could deliver a sharper-than-expected pullback.
- 10-Year and 30-Year Treasury Auctions: Demand dynamics at these auctions will be closely watched as a gauge of investor appetite for duration in the new volatility regime. Bid-to-cover ratios and dealer allocations will signal whether foreign and domestic buyers are willing to absorb supply at current yield levels.
- Michigan Consumer Sentiment (March 14): The preliminary March reading will capture the first consumer reaction to both the oil price increase and the negative payrolls print. The inflation expectations component is critical given the visible energy price pass-through at the retail level.
US Economic Positioning and Global Context
The Iran conflict has fundamentally altered the global macro landscape for fixed income investors. The approximately 35% weekly increase in WTI crude—one of the largest single-week moves in oil futures history—has immediate implications for inflation dynamics worldwide, but the effects are distributed unevenly. The United States, as a net energy producer, faces a more modulated impact than pure import-dependent economies, yet the pass-through to consumer prices and inflation expectations is already visible in market-based breakevens and the ISM prices paid data.
The S&P 500 declined approximately 2.0% to around 6,740 for the week, with the Russell 2000 falling 4.1% as small-cap companies faced the most acute margin pressure from rising input costs. Energy was the sole positive sector. The U.S. Dollar Index rose approximately 1.3% on safe-haven demand and the relative advantage of U.S. energy independence, while gold traded near $5,090 per ounce—retreating from a record above $5,400 earlier in the week as rising yields and dollar strength offset geopolitical demand.
For fixed income portfolios, the implications are clear. Duration now carries asymmetric risk in a stagflationary environment: it fails to hedge equity drawdowns when inflation is the dominant driver. Credit selection—particularly the IG versus HY allocation decision—becomes more consequential as the quality rotation evident in this week's spread data may accelerate. The belly of the curve (3-7 years) appears most vulnerable to further repricing given its sensitivity to both policy rate expectations and term premium, while front-end positioning offers relatively limited yield pickup for the optionality of potential cuts. The bond market's 2026 playbook, which was built around a gradual easing cycle, requires substantial revision.
Key Articles of the Week
-
Prior Week's Report: Treasury Yields Feb 2026 – 10-Year Breaks Below 4%Mariemont Capital – Duration & Credit PulseMarch 2, 2026Read Report
-
U.S. Payrolls Unexpectedly Fell by 92,000 in February; Unemployment Rate Rises to 4.4%CNBCMarch 6, 2026Read Article
-
Employment Situation Summary – February 2026 ResultsU.S. Bureau of Labor StatisticsMarch 6, 2026Read Article
-
10-Year Treasury Yield Lower After Weak Jobs Report, but Decline in Check as Oil Continues SurgeCNBCMarch 6, 2026Read Article
-
Treasury Yields Edge Higher as Investors Monitor the Latest on the U.S.-Iran WarCNBCMarch 4, 2026Read Article
-
ADP National Employment Report: Private Sector Employment Increased by 63,000 Jobs in FebruaryADP Media CenterMarch 4, 2026Read Article
-
Manufacturing PMI at 52.4%; February 2026 ISM Manufacturing PMI ReportInstitute for Supply Management (via PR Newswire)March 2, 2026Read Article
-
Dow Suffers Worst Week Since April as Oil Hits $90 and Weak Jobs Data Adds to Market AnxietyCNN BusinessMarch 6, 2026Read Article
Frequently Asked Questions
Why did Treasury yields rise during the Iran war instead of falling?
Unlike prior geopolitical crises where bonds attracted safe-haven flows, this week's conflict disrupted global oil supply through the Strait of Hormuz closure, sending crude prices up roughly 35%. The resulting inflation shock—visible in breakeven rates rising above 3% at the 2-year maturity—overwhelmed traditional flight-to-quality demand. Bond markets effectively repriced for a stagflationary scenario where inflation, not growth, is the dominant risk.
What does the negative nonfarm payrolls print mean for Fed rate cuts in 2026?
February's loss of 92,000 jobs was the first negative monthly reading in years, but the simultaneous 0.4% monthly wage increase creates a policy dilemma. The Fed cannot cut rates to support employment when wage and energy inflation remain elevated. Markets have repriced from expecting two cuts in 2026 to at most one in December, with the fed funds rate likely remaining at 3.50-3.75% through most of the year.
How does the oil price shock affect credit spreads and corporate bonds?
Credit markets showed a quality rotation this week: investment grade spreads tightened 4bp while high yield widened 4bp, reflecting institutional preference for higher-rated paper during stress periods. Both remain in the lower third of their 5-year ranges (34th and 30th percentiles), but the VIX at 29.49 (94th percentile) suggests equity-implied risk has not yet been transmitted to credit. Historically, this divergence resolves through spread widening within 4-6 weeks.
What should fixed income investors watch at the March 2026 FOMC meeting?
The March 17-18 FOMC meeting includes updated economic projections and dot plots, making it the most closely watched since the 2022 tightening cycle. Key elements to monitor: the median 2026 rate projection (currently 3.375% implied by two cuts), inflation forecast revisions given the oil shock, and Chair Powell's characterization of whether tariff and energy costs represent transitory versus persistent price pressures.




