Duration & Credit Pulse: July 13, 2025

FOMC Minutes July 2025: Fed Signals Rate Cuts as Labor Market Weakens | Duration & Credit Pulse

Duration & Credit Pulse

Week Ending July 13, 2025

Executive Summary

Bottom Line: The Federal Reserve's June FOMC minutes released July 9 revealed that most participants favor rate cuts this year, marking a pivotal shift as labor market weakness emerged with ADP's first private payroll decline (-33,000) since March 2023. Treasury yields edged higher despite dovish Fed signals, with the 10-year closing the week at 4.41% (87th percentile), while credit spreads remained near historic lows with investment grade at 77 basis points (25th percentile), creating a dangerous asymmetry between compressed risk premiums and deteriorating fundamentals.

Duration Dashboard

MaturityJuly 7, 2025July 13, 2025Weekly Δ5-Year Percentile
2‑Year 3.90% 3.89% -1 bp 49th %ile (middle range)
5‑Year 3.96% 3.97% +2 bp 64th %ile (middle range)
10‑Year 4.38% 4.41% +3 bp 87th %ile (elevated)
30‑Year 4.92% 4.95% +3 bp 98th %ile (extreme)

Fed Pivot Meets Term Premium Expansion

3.8% 4.0% 4.2% 4.4% 4.6% 4.8% 5.0% 2Y 5Y 10Y 30Y Holiday-Shortened Week Sees Modest Steepening 3.89% 3.97% 4.41% 4.95% July 7, 2025 July 13, 2025

Curve Analysis: The Treasury curve exhibited modest steepening during the holiday-shortened week, with the 2s10s spread remaining deeply inverted at -52 basis points despite dovish FOMC minutes. The 30-year yield's approach to 5% (98th historical percentile) signals term premium expansion as markets grapple with fiscal sustainability concerns and potential Fed policy error risks. The persistent inversion, now exceeding 750 days, approaches historical records and suggests either imminent recession or a structural shift in curve dynamics driven by quantitative tightening and foreign demand patterns.

The release of June FOMC minutes on July 9 provided the week's pivotal moment, revealing that "most participants assessed that some reduction in the target range for the federal funds rate this year would likely be appropriate." This dovish revelation coincided with deteriorating labor market data, as ADP reported the first private sector job losses since March 2023. Despite these easing signals, longer-dated Treasury yields rose modestly, suggesting markets are balancing Fed pivot expectations against persistent structural inflation concerns and massive Treasury supply needs.

Tariff Pause Expiration – Relief Rally or Delayed Reckoning? The July 9 expiration of the 90-day tariff pause passed without immediate implementation, triggering relief across risk assets despite underlying trade tensions. Yet the University of Michigan survey revealed 60% of respondents spontaneously mentioning tariff concerns, suggesting Main Street anxiety far exceeds Wall Street complacency. The administration's decision to delay implementation may reflect political calculations ahead of upcoming economic data, but markets pricing in permanent postponement may be premature. With China trade tensions escalating and USMCA renegotiation looming, the current spread compression assumes a benign outcome that history suggests is unlikely.

Treasury supply-demand dynamics explain the yield paradox: The week's most puzzling development was rising long-dated yields despite dovish Fed signals and weakening employment. The answer lies in technical factors: the Treasury announced $119 billion in coupon auctions for the following week, while dealer balance sheets remain constrained by regulatory requirements. Japanese investors, benefiting from reduced hedging costs as the yield curve steepens, provided crucial support with $42 billion in purchases during June, but this demand remains rate-sensitive. The 30-year yield approaching 5% (98th percentile) reflects term premium normalization after years of QE suppression rather than growth optimism.

Fed's Delicate Dance: The Federal Reserve faces an increasingly complex calculus as labor market cracks emerge while inflation remains "somewhat elevated" according to the minutes. The committee's acknowledgment of "considerable uncertainty" regarding tariff impacts highlights the challenge of conducting monetary policy amid trade policy volatility. With manufacturing in its fourth month of contraction and services barely expanding at 50.8, the Fed must balance preventing recession against reigniting inflation. The minutes' revelation that several members see risks tilted toward overtightening suggests September easing is increasingly likely, though markets may be overestimating the pace of subsequent cuts.

Credit Pulse

MetricJuly 7, 2025July 13, 2025Weekly Δ5-Year Percentile
IG OAS 76 bp 77 bp +1 bp 25th %ile (middle range)
HY OAS 267 bp 273 bp +6 bp 16th %ile (low)
VIX Index 17.79 16.40 -1.39 29th %ile (middle range)

Credit markets demonstrated remarkable complacency during a week featuring labor market deterioration and geopolitical tensions, with high yield spreads widening a mere 6 basis points to 273bp, remaining at just the 16th percentile of historical ranges. Investment grade spreads barely budged, tightening 1 basis point to 77bp despite the negative ADP print and tariff uncertainty. This extreme spread compression reflects powerful technical dynamics—foreign inflows, corporate buybacks, and yield-starved pension demand—overwhelming deteriorating fundamentals.

Geopolitical Risk Grossly Underpriced: U.S. military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities early in the week drove initial flight-to-quality flows that pushed 10-year yields briefly below 4.35%, yet by week's end both credit spreads and the VIX had compressed further. This disconnect between escalating Middle East tensions and risk asset complacency is historically extreme. The VIX at 16.40 (29th percentile) while military confrontation with Iran intensifies suggests options markets are dangerously mispricing tail risks. Previous episodes of similar geopolitical/volatility divergence—August 2019, February 2020—resolved violently against risk assets.

Credit's valuation asymmetry reaches dangerous extremes: With high yield spreads at the 16th percentile while the first job losses in over two years materialize, credit markets exhibit extreme valuation risk. Historical analysis shows that when spreads reach current levels with deteriorating employment trends, median forward 12-month excess returns turn negative. The combination of peak valuations, turning credit cycles, and Fed pivot uncertainty creates asymmetric downside risk that current spreads fail to compensate. Foreign investment grade inflows of $109 billion year-to-date have created a technical bid divorced from fundamentals, but these flows historically reverse quickly when sentiment shifts.

US Macroeconomic Assessment – Labor Market Inflection Point

The week of July 7-13 delivered unmistakable evidence of economic deceleration, headlined by ADP's shocking report of 33,000 private sector job losses in June—the first contraction since March 2023. Professional and business services shed 56,000 positions while healthcare and education lost 52,000 jobs, signaling weakness in traditionally resilient sectors. Annual pay growth decelerated to 4.4%, the slowest pace in three years, suggesting wage-price spiral risks are finally abating.

Services sector stabilizes while manufacturing struggles: The ISM Services PMI for June climbed to 50.8% from May's contractionary 49.9%, driven by improvements in business activity (54.2%) and new orders (51.3%). However, manufacturing remained in contraction territory with the ISM index at 49.0%, marking the fourth consecutive month below 50. This divergence highlights the economy's increasing reliance on services consumption even as goods-producing sectors face headwinds from elevated rates and trade uncertainty.

Tale of Two Economies: The ISM divergence between expanding services (50.8) and contracting manufacturing (49.0) reveals an economy running on one engine. Services barely clearing the expansion threshold while manufacturing enters its fourth month of contraction suggests the Fed's "solid economy" narrative is increasingly tenuous. With goods-producing sectors representing early-cycle indicators, their persistent weakness despite anticipated Fed easing raises questions about whether monetary policy can offset structural headwinds from deglobalization, tariff uncertainty, and technology disruption. Credit markets pricing in continued expansion appear to be betting entirely on services resilience—a dangerous wager given consumer sentiment at cycle lows.

Claims data provides mixed signals: Weekly jobless claims fell to 227,000 for the week ending July 5, the fourth consecutive decline and lowest level in two months. Yet the four-week moving average remained elevated at 233,000, consistent with gradual labor market softening. The juxtaposition of improving claims data with negative payroll growth suggests possible seasonal distortions or divergent trends between large corporations (cutting aggressively) and smaller businesses (still hiring).

Consumer sentiment remains depressed: The University of Michigan consumer sentiment index registered just 61.7 for July, with approximately 60% of respondents making unprompted negative comments about tariffs. This highlights how trade policy uncertainty is weighing on household confidence even before full implementation. The combination of softening employment, weak sentiment, and moderating wage growth provides the Federal Reserve with increasing justification for policy easing, though inflation concerns persist.

Federal Reserve Policy Outlook – FOMC Minutes Signal Pivot

The release of June FOMC minutes fundamentally shifted market expectations, with the revelation that "most participants assessed that some reduction in the target range for the federal funds rate this year would likely be appropriate." This represents a material evolution from the committee's prior hawkish stance, driven by accumulating evidence of economic cooling and confidence that inflation is moving toward target. The minutes revealed extensive discussion of tariff impacts, with officials acknowledging "considerable uncertainty about timing, size, and duration of these effects" on inflation.

Market pricing responded decisively, with fed funds futures indicating 65% probability of a 25 basis point cut at the September meeting and near certainty of at least one reduction by year-end 2025. The anticipated easing cycle is expected to proceed gradually, with consensus clustering around two cuts in 2025 followed by a pause to assess conditions. The committee's characterization of the labor market as showing "recent signs of weakening" provides political cover for preemptive easing even with inflation remaining "somewhat elevated" above target. The Fed's quantitative tightening program continues at $60 billion monthly, having reduced the balance sheet by $2.25 trillion since June 2022.

Treasury Market Dynamics – Supply Pressures Build

The approaching week's $119 billion Treasury auction calendar—$58 billion 3-years, $39 billion 10-years, and $22 billion 30-years—will test whether current demand can absorb elevated supply without significant concessions. Primary dealers reported adequate balance sheet capacity during the July 10 quarterly refunding announcement, but warned that regulatory constraints could limit their ability to intermediate flows during periods of volatility. Foreign demand remains the critical swing factor, with Japanese investors' $42 billion June purchases providing essential support. However, this demand proves rate-sensitive; any backup in JGB yields or strengthening of the yen could quickly reverse these flows. The term premium expansion evident in 30-year yields at the 98th percentile suggests the market is beginning to price the fiscal sustainability challenges that $2 trillion deficits create, though credit markets remain bizarrely immune to these concerns.

Week Ahead: CPI Data and Earnings Season Take Center Stage

  • Consumer Price Index (July 15): June CPI represents the week's marquee event, with consensus expecting headline inflation to moderate to 2.9% year-over-year from May's 3.1%. Core CPI forecast to remain sticky at 3.3%, potentially complicating the Fed's easing narrative.
  • Producer Price Index (July 16): June PPI offers insights into pipeline inflation pressures ahead of corporate earnings season.
  • Retail Sales (July 17): June retail sales will gauge consumer resilience amid softening employment conditions and tariff concerns.
  • Housing Data (July 17): Housing starts and building permits data will assess construction momentum with mortgage rates elevated.
  • Treasury Auctions: Heavy issuance with $58 billion 3-year notes (July 15), $39 billion 10-year notes (July 16), and $22 billion 30-year bonds (July 17).
  • Bank Earnings (July 18-19): JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup kick off earnings season, offering critical insights into credit conditions and loan demand.

The Great Disconnect: Job Losses Meet Spread Compression

The week ending July 13 crystallized one of the most extreme valuation disconnects in recent fixed income history: credit spreads compressed to historic tights even as the labor market posted its first private sector job losses since March 2023. This divergence between deteriorating fundamentals and risk asset complacency has reached levels last seen in February 2020, weeks before the pandemic-driven market collapse. The high yield market's 16th percentile spread ranking while unemployment claims remain elevated and manufacturing contracts for the fourth consecutive month defies both economic logic and historical precedent.

Technical flows overwhelm fundamental reality: The persistence of tight spreads amid weakening data reflects three powerful technical forces that have temporarily suspended normal market dynamics. First, foreign investors have poured $109 billion into U.S. investment grade bonds year-to-date, driven by attractive hedged yields and relative stability versus European alternatives. Second, systematic strategies and volatility-targeting funds have increased allocations as the VIX collapsed below 17, creating reflexive spread compression. Third, corporate pension funds approaching full funding continue to de-risk from equities into credit regardless of valuations. These flows have created an artificial bid that has divorced spreads from credit fundamentals—a condition that historically corrects violently when any of these technical supports wavers. The July 9 tariff pause expiration without implementation may have been the last clear catalyst for spread widening; with that passed, investors seem content to collect carry until the deterioration becomes undeniable.

Key Articles of the Week

  • Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee June 17-18, 2025
    Federal Reserve
    July 9, 2025
    Read Article
  • US Jobless Claims Fall a Fourth Week During July 4 Holiday
    Bloomberg
    July 10, 2025
    Read Article
  • ISM Services Index Expands in June at 50.8%
    Institute for Supply Management
    July 7, 2025
    Read Article
  • ADP Report: Private Sector Lost 33,000 Jobs in June
    CNBC
    July 2, 2025
    Read Article
  • Treasury Yields Snapshot: July 11, 2025
    Advisor Perspectives
    July 11, 2025
    Read Article
  • Q3 2025 Corporate Bond Market Outlook
    Breckinridge Capital
    July 8, 2025
    Read Article
  • High Yield Market Update: July 2025
    Newfleet Asset Management
    July 10, 2025
    Read Article
  • Chart to Watch: Are Corporate Credit Spreads Too Tight?
    Janus Henderson
    July 9, 2025
    Read Article

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the July FOMC minutes reveal about Fed rate cuts?

The July 9 release of June FOMC minutes showed most participants favor reducing rates this year, marking a dovish pivot. The Fed acknowledged labor market weakening and progress toward the 2% inflation target, with markets now pricing 65% probability of a September cut and near certainty of easing by year-end 2025.

Why are credit spreads so tight despite the first job losses in over two years?

High yield spreads at 273 basis points (16th percentile) reflect powerful technical forces including $109 billion in foreign investment grade inflows, systematic strategy allocations, and pension de-risking flows. This technical bid has overwhelmed deteriorating fundamentals, creating dangerous valuation asymmetry with historically negative forward returns from similar setups.

Content Produced By:
Justin Taylor

Important Disclaimer

This report is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation to buy or sell any security, or a solicitation of any kind. The information contained herein is believed to be reliable but cannot be guaranteed as to its accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

The analysis and opinions expressed in this report are those of Mariemont Capital and are subject to change without notice. Market conditions, economic factors, and investment strategies evolve continuously, and the views expressed herein may not reflect current conditions or opinions at a later date.

No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the fairness, accuracy, completeness, or correctness of the information and opinions contained herein. Mariemont Capital and its affiliates, officers, directors, and employees may have positions in the securities mentioned in this report and may make purchases or sales while this report is in circulation.

Investing in fixed income securities involves risks, including interest rate risk, credit risk, inflation risk, reinvestment risk, and liquidity risk. The value of investments can go down as well as up, and investors may not get back the amount originally invested. This report should not be relied upon as the sole basis for investment decisions. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and consult with qualified financial, legal, and tax advisors before making any investment.

This report may not be reproduced, distributed, or published without the prior written consent of Mariemont Capital. By accessing this report, you acknowledge and agree to be bound by the terms of this disclaimer.

Sources: Available upon request to jt@mariemontcapital.com
Data extracted from public and private data sources.
© 2025 Mariemont Capital. All rights reserved.
Published: Sunday, July 13, 2025, 6:45 PM EST