Duration & Credit Pulse: March 9, 2025

Duration & Credit Pulse – Week Ending March 9, 2025 | Mariemont Capital

Duration & Credit Pulse

Week Ending March 9, 2025

Executive Summary

Bottom Line: Tariff implementation on March 4 triggered the most significant fixed income volatility of 2025, with Treasury yields whipsawing between haven demand and inflation fears while credit spreads flashed warning signals. The 10-year yield traded in a dramatic 4.2-4.5% range as markets grappled with competing forces of flight-to-quality flows and tariff-induced inflation concerns, ultimately closing the week at 4.30%—up 9 basis points in classic bear steepening fashion that saw long bonds underperform.

Duration Dashboard

MaturityMarch 2, 2025March 9, 2025Weekly Δ5-Year Percentile
2‑Year 3.99% 4.00% +1 bp 36th %ile (middle range)
5‑Year 4.02% 4.09% +7 bp 60th %ile (middle range)
10‑Year 4.21% 4.30% +9 bp 75th %ile (elevated)
30‑Year 4.49% 4.60% +11 bp 81st %ile (elevated)

Bear Steepening Amid Tariff Turbulence

3.9% 4.1% 4.3% 4.5% 4.7% 2Y 5Y 10Y 30Y Tariff-Driven Bear Steepening 4.00% 4.09% 4.30% 4.60% March 2, 2025 March 9, 2025

Curve Analysis: Treasury markets exhibited classic bear steepening behavior as tariff implementation drove inflation expectations higher, with the 2s30s spread widening to 60 basis points from 50bp the prior week. The relatively modest 1bp move in 2-year yields versus 11bp in 30-years revealed market conviction that the Fed would maintain its patient stance despite building inflationary pressures. Intraweek volatility far exceeded end-of-week changes, with the 10-year touching 4.50% during peak tariff anxiety before recovering on strong foreign demand and flight-to-quality flows.

The implementation of sweeping tariffs on March 4—25% on Canadian and Mexican goods, 20% on Chinese imports—sent shockwaves through Treasury markets that belied the relatively modest weekly changes. While the 10-year yield ended the week up just 9 basis points at 4.30%, intraday swings exceeded 30bp as traders wrestled with competing narratives of growth destruction versus embedded inflation. The curve's bear steepening dynamic reflected growing consensus that tariffs represent a stagflationary impulse the Fed cannot easily counter, with long-end yields bearing the brunt of inflation risk premium repricing.

Tariff Reality Hits Different Than Theory: Markets discovered this week that actual tariff implementation carries far greater psychological impact than mere threats. The S&P 500's 1.8% plunge on March 3 ahead of implementation triggered massive Treasury inflows that initially drove yields lower, but as details emerged of immediate price hikes across consumer goods, inflation fears overwhelmed haven demand. The 30-year bond's approach to 5% during intraweek trading marked a psychological inflection point—forcing institutional allocators to reconsider duration risk in a world where fiscal dominance and trade wars create permanent inflation volatility.

Credit Pulse

MetricMarch 2, 2025March 9, 2025Weekly Δ5-Year Percentile
IG OAS 83 bp 85 bp +2 bp 19th %ile (very tight)
HY OAS 294 bp 300 bp +6 bp 13th %ile (extremely tight)
VIX Index 19.63 23.37 +3.74 77th %ile (elevated)

Credit markets flashed warning signals even as spreads remained at historically tight levels, with high yield widening 6bp to 300bp while maintaining its position at just the 13th percentile of its 5-year range. The disconnect between still-compressed spreads and surging volatility—VIX jumped to 23.37, its 77th percentile—suggests credit investors remain dangerously complacent about tariff impacts on corporate profitability. Reports indicated high yield spreads briefly touched 400bp during Tuesday's panic before compression buyers emerged, viewing the selloff as premature given still-solid fundamentals.

Credit's Tariff Blind Spot: The modest 6bp widening in high yield spreads grossly understates the fundamental repricing required for a tariff-shocked economy. With spreads still at the 13th percentile despite VIX surging to the 77th percentile, credit markets exhibit extreme cognitive dissonance. Companies with significant international supply chains face margin compression that current spreads simply don't reflect. The last time we saw similar VIX/spread divergence was February 2020—weeks before credit markets collapsed. Investment grade's 85bp spread offers virtually no cushion for the earnings disappointments that tariff pass-through will inevitably create.

US Macroeconomic Assessment – Tariffs Transform the Landscape

The week of March 3-9 marked a watershed moment as trade policy shifted from threat to reality, fundamentally altering the US economic trajectory. Monday's confirmation that tariffs would proceed as scheduled—despite last-minute diplomatic efforts—triggered immediate real-world consequences that revealed how deeply integrated global supply chains had become. The 25% levies on Canadian and Mexican imports not qualifying for USMCA treatment, alongside 20% tariffs on Chinese goods, created instant price pressures that rippled through financial markets and corporate boardrooms alike.

Trade data reveals anticipatory surge: Thursday's release of January trade figures exposed the economy's pre-tariff hoarding behavior, with the deficit exploding to $131.4 billion—a staggering 34% monthly increase. Imports surged by $36.6 billion as companies stockpiled inventory ahead of tariff implementation, creating artificial demand that will reverse violently in coming months. This represents the largest percentage increase in the trade deficit since March 2015, suggesting businesses viewed tariff threats as credible and acted accordingly. The front-loading of imports ironically worsened the very trade imbalances tariffs aimed to address.

Labor markets show early stress fractures: While headline employment data remained solid—151,000 jobs added in February with unemployment ticking up modestly to 4.1%—underlying dynamics revealed growing concerns. Initial jobless claims improved to 221,000, but federal unemployment compensation applications surged to four-year highs as Department of Government Efficiency initiatives accelerated workforce reductions. Manufacturing employment contracted for the third consecutive month, with tariff uncertainty freezing hiring plans across trade-sensitive sectors. The disconnect between still-tight labor markets and building corporate caution creates policy complications for the Federal Reserve.

Inflation expectations regime shift: Market-based inflation measures underwent dramatic repricing as tariff reality set in. Five-year breakeven inflation rates jumped 18 basis points during the week to 2.95%, the highest level since 2022's inflation surge. Consumer goods companies began announcing price increases within hours of tariff implementation—Walmart indicated 10-25% increases on affected categories, while auto manufacturers warned of $2,000-5,000 vehicle price hikes. The immediate pass-through of tariff costs shattered any hope that corporations would absorb the impact through margin compression.

Federal Reserve Policy Outlook

The Federal Reserve entered its pre-FOMC blackout period on March 8 at precisely the wrong moment, leaving markets without guidance as tariff implementation roiled financial conditions. The central bank faces an impossible trinity: fighting inflation that tariffs will accelerate, supporting growth that trade wars will impair, and maintaining credibility while fiscal policy actively undermines price stability. Market pricing for the March 18-19 meeting shifted dramatically during the week, with probability of a rate hold through 2025 rising to 75% from 60% as traders recognized the Fed's paralysis.

Behind closed doors, Fed officials surely grapple with whether tariffs represent a one-time price level adjustment or the beginning of sustained inflation pressure. History suggests trade wars create rolling waves of retaliation and adjustment that embed inflation expectations, but premature tightening could amplify tariffs' negative growth impact. The Committee's updated economic projections on March 19 will likely show upward revisions to inflation forecasts and downward revisions to growth—the textbook definition of stagflation that monetary policy cannot easily address. Powell's press conference looms as potentially the most consequential since the inflation fight began.

Week Ahead: FOMC Decision Meets Tariff Aftermath

  • Retail Sales (March 14): February data takes on heightened importance as first clean read on consumer behavior post-tariff announcement. Consensus expects -0.2% decline as pre-buying exhausted demand, but tariff front-running could create upside surprise.
  • CPI Inflation (March 12): February CPI becomes critical marker for pre-tariff price pressures. Core expected at 0.3% monthly, but any upside surprise would cement hawkish Fed pivot given tariff acceleration ahead.
  • FOMC Meeting (March 18-19): Most consequential Fed meeting in years as Committee must address tariff implications. Updated dot plot likely shows fewer 2025 cuts while Powell faces intense questioning on stagflation risks.
  • Housing Starts (March 19): Mortgage rates above 7% and construction cost surge from steel/lumber tariffs create perfect storm for housing. Permits data will reveal if builders are retrenching.
  • Michigan Sentiment (March 15): Early read on consumer confidence post-tariff implementation. Inflation expectations component critical given visible price increases across retail channels.

US Economic Positioning and Global Context

America's turn toward economic nationalism via tariffs creates profound dislocations in the post-war economic order, with implications extending far beyond near-term market volatility. The synchronous easing by major central banks—ECB's cut to 2.5%, China's comprehensive stimulus package—reflects recognition that US trade policy represents a permanent shock requiring sustained monetary offset. Yet this policy divergence creates its own instabilities, with massive capital flows toward US assets even as American policy grows increasingly erratic.

Dollar hegemony faces first real test: The great irony of "America First" trade policy is its potential to undermine the very dollar supremacy it claims to defend. This week's Treasury International Capital data showing $254.3 billion in March inflows demonstrates continued foreign appetite for US assets, but conversations in Beijing, Brussels, and beyond increasingly focus on reducing dollar dependence. The combination of weaponized trade policy, fiscal profligacy approaching 7% of GDP, and political volatility creates conditions where dollar alternatives gain momentum. For fixed income investors, this means reassessing long-held assumptions about Treasury market depth, foreign demand reliability, and currency stability. The bear steepening in the curve this week may represent early recognition that term premium must rise to compensate for policy uncertainty that tariffs exemplify. Credit markets' failure to adequately price corporate risks suggests the repricing process has only just begun.

Key Articles of the Week

  • Fed's Powell Gets Chance to Address Trade War, Stagflation Fears
    Reuters
    March 7, 2025
    Read Article
  • U.S. International Trade in Goods and Services, January 2025
    U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis
    March 7, 2025
    Read Article
  • Wall St Ends Higher After Fed Chief's Comments, But Posts Big Weekly Loss
    Reuters
    March 7, 2025
    Read Article
  • US Labor Market Steady, Tariffs and Federal Government Layoffs a Risk to Outlook
    Reuters
    March 6, 2025
    Read Article
  • 10-Year Treasury Yield Rises After Weaker-Than-Expected Jobs Growth, Powell Comments
    CNBC
    March 7, 2025
    Read Article
  • Employment Situation News Release - February 2025 Results
    Bureau of Labor Statistics
    March 7, 2025
    Read Article
  • Initial Claims Data - Weekly Jobless Claims Fall More Than Expected
    Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (FRED)
    March 6, 2025
    Read Article
Content Produced By:
Justin Taylor

Important Disclaimer

This report is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation to buy or sell any security, or a solicitation of any kind. The information contained herein is believed to be reliable but cannot be guaranteed as to its accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

The analysis and opinions expressed in this report are those of Mariemont Capital and are subject to change without notice. Market conditions, economic factors, and investment strategies evolve continuously, and the views expressed herein may not reflect current conditions or opinions at a later date.

No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the fairness, accuracy, completeness, or correctness of the information and opinions contained herein. Mariemont Capital and its affiliates, officers, directors, and employees may have positions in the securities mentioned in this report and may make purchases or sales while this report is in circulation.

Investing in fixed income securities involves risks, including interest rate risk, credit risk, inflation risk, reinvestment risk, and liquidity risk. The value of investments can go down as well as up, and investors may not get back the amount originally invested. This report should not be relied upon as the sole basis for investment decisions. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and consult with qualified financial, legal, and tax advisors before making any investment.

This report may not be reproduced, distributed, or published without the prior written consent of Mariemont Capital. By accessing this report, you acknowledge and agree to be bound by the terms of this disclaimer.

Sources: U.S. Treasury, ICE BofA Indices, CBOE, Federal Reserve, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Reuters, CNBC, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
Data extracted from market databases and Federal Reserve communications.
© 2025 Mariemont Capital. All rights reserved.
Published: Sunday, March 9, 2025, 6:00 PM EST