FOMC March 2026: Treasury Yields Rise as Oil Shock Persists

Strait of Hormuz shipping corridor at dusk with oil tankers amid geopolitical tension and rising energy prices in March 2026
FOMC March 2026 Rate Decision: Treasury Yields Rise as Fed Holds, Oil Shock Persists | Duration & Credit Pulse

Duration & Credit Pulse

Week Ending March 22, 2026

Executive Summary

Bottom Line: The FOMC March 2026 rate decision to hold at 3.50–3.75% — paired with an upgraded inflation forecast and hawkish dot plot — triggered a broad repricing of the Treasury curve. The 10-year yield rose 11 basis points to 4.39%, its highest close since July 2025, while a hotter-than-expected PPI report (+0.7% m/m vs. +0.3% consensus) and continued Strait of Hormuz disruption from the Iran conflict kept energy-driven inflation concerns at the forefront. Bond traders effectively removed all 2026 rate cut expectations by Friday's close, with the 2-year yield rising above the effective fed funds rate for the first time since November 2023. Credit spreads widened modestly, with high yield OAS expanding 22bp to 320bp, though still within the middle of the 5-year range.

FOMC March 2026 Decision: Duration Dashboard

MaturityMarch 13, 2026March 20, 2026Weekly Δ5-Year Percentile
2‑Year 3.72% 3.90% +18 bp 49th %ile (middle range)
5‑Year 3.86% 4.03% +17 bp 68th %ile (middle range)
10‑Year 4.28% 4.39% +11 bp 85th %ile (elevated)
30‑Year 4.91% 4.96% +6 bp 98th %ile (extreme)

Front-End Led Bear Flattening Post-FOMC

3.7% 4.0% 4.3% 4.6% 4.9% 2Y 5Y 10Y 30Y Rate Repricing Concentrates in Short End 3.90% 4.03% 4.39% 4.96% March 13, 2026 March 20, 2026

Curve Analysis: The Treasury curve exhibited front-end-led bear flattening — a pattern consistent with rapid monetary policy repricing. The 2-year yield's 18bp weekly advance more than tripled the 30-year's 6bp rise, compressing the 2s10s spread from 56bp to 49bp and the 2s30s spread from 119bp to 106bp. The 2-year's rise above the effective fed funds rate of 3.64% signals that markets have shifted from discounting easing to pricing the possibility of further tightening — a threshold crossing not seen since November 2023. The 30-year yield at 4.96% — the 98th percentile of its 5-year range — reflects the combined weight of persistent inflation risk, elevated fiscal deficits, and geopolitical uncertainty commanding a growing term premium.

The FOMC's March 17–18 meeting produced the week's most consequential repricing event. The Committee voted 11–1 to maintain the federal funds rate at 3.50–3.75%, with the dissent favoring a 25bp cut. While the median dot plot still projects one 25bp cut in 2026, the distribution shifted meaningfully: seven of 19 participants now see no cuts this year, up from six in December. The Summary of Economic Projections raised the 2026 PCE inflation forecast to 2.7% from 2.4% — the largest single-meeting upward revision since June 2022 — while adding explicit language acknowledging the economic uncertainty stemming from the Middle East conflict. As detailed in our March 15 preview report, the pre-FOMC setup pointed to a hawkish outcome, and the Committee delivered beyond consensus expectations.

Policy Path Reset: Chair Powell's press conference set the tone when he acknowledged that inflation progress has fallen short of expectations. The updated dot plot — while technically still showing one cut — reflected a Committee increasingly skeptical of near-term easing. By Friday, fed funds futures priced zero cuts for the remainder of 2026, with the first fully-priced 25bp reduction pushed to late 2027. Governor Waller's Friday remarks were particularly notable: he revealed he had planned to dissent in favor of a cut but was persuaded otherwise by the oil shock's inflation implications. His comment that prolonged elevated oil prices would have a non-transitory impact on inflation underscored the Fed's growing concern about second-round energy effects. However, Waller also stated that rate hikes are not under consideration — a view that provides some ceiling to the front-end repricing.

Wednesday's PPI report amplified the hawkish narrative. February producer prices rose 0.7% month-over-month — more than double the 0.3% consensus — with core PPI also surprising at +0.5%. Year-over-year PPI accelerated to 3.4%, the highest reading since early 2025. The report arrived just hours before the FOMC decision, effectively reinforcing the Committee's decision to upgrade inflation projections. The strength was broad-based, with final demand goods up 1.1% and services rising 0.5%, suggesting pipeline price pressures that may flow through to consumer prices in coming months.

Supply dynamics compounded the rate repricing. The Treasury Department sold $606 billion in securities across nine auctions during the week — a pace that reflects the federal government's persistent financing needs against a backdrop of annual deficits exceeding $1.9 trillion. Gross national debt surpassed $39 trillion for the first time on March 17. The sheer volume of issuance competing for fixed income capital adds structural upward pressure on yields, particularly at the long end where term premium has expanded. Investment grade corporate issuance also remained elevated, with the prior week having produced a record single-day volume of $65.8 billion, though the March 16–20 window likely saw reduced activity given the FOMC meeting and heightened volatility.

Credit Pulse: Spreads Widen as Treasury Yields Rise

MetricMarch 13, 2026March 20, 2026Weekly Δ5-Year Percentile
IG OAS 88 bp 92 bp +4 bp 58th %ile (middle range)
HY OAS 298 bp 320 bp +22 bp 42nd %ile (middle range)
VIX Index 27.19 26.78 −0.41 90th %ile (extreme)

Credit markets absorbed the week's hawkish repricing with notable composure, though the direction of spread movement was clearly wider. High yield OAS expanded 22 basis points to 320bp — the largest weekly widening since early March when the Iran conflict began — but remains near the middle of its 5-year range at the 42nd percentile. Investment grade spreads edged 4bp wider to 92bp, well above the historic 71bp low touched in late January but still in the middle of the distribution at the 58th percentile. As discussed in our March 8 report on the Iran oil shock, the initial credit market response to geopolitical disruption has been measured relative to the magnitude of the underlying event.

The VIX edged lower by 0.41 points to 26.78 despite equity weakness, though its 90th percentile reading signals that implied volatility remains well above normal levels. The S&P 500 declined for a fourth consecutive week, falling approximately 1.9% and breaking below its 200-day moving average on Thursday for the first time in over 200 sessions — a technically significant event that may trigger systematic selling strategies. The Russell 2000 entered formal correction territory, and energy was the only positive S&P 500 sector for the week. CDX credit default swap indices rose to 9-month highs — a signal that has historically preceded further spread widening.

Gold's sharp decline — down approximately 10% from record highs to roughly $4,500 per ounce in its worst weekly performance since 2011 — provided an important cross-asset signal for fixed income investors. The selloff reflected rising real yields, a classic deleveraging dynamic where leveraged positions facing margin calls liquidate even safe-haven assets to meet collateral requirements. This type of forced selling, combined with the equity correction, suggests that cross-asset risk is more interconnected than credit spreads alone would indicate.

Credit Risk Assessment — Private Credit Stress Signals: While public credit markets have widened in an orderly fashion, private credit vehicles are showing more pronounced strain. The Cliffwater BDC Index has declined approximately 11.5% year-to-date. Software-sector exposure represents a particular concentration risk: while software accounts for only 3% of the high yield bond market, it comprises 14% of leveraged loans and an estimated 21% of private credit portfolios, creating potential vulnerability to AI-driven business model disruption. Consumer credit deterioration continues in the background, with credit card 90+ day delinquencies near multi-year highs. These developments warrant monitoring as potential transmission channels from private to public credit markets, particularly if the higher-rate environment persists.

US Macroeconomic Assessment — Stagflation Risk Rises

The week's economic data painted a picture of sticky inflation against a backdrop of mixed growth signals, reinforcing the stagflationary concerns that have dominated fixed income markets since the Iran conflict began. The combination of hot producer prices, resilient labor markets, and deteriorating sentiment indicators leaves the Federal Reserve in an increasingly constrained position.

Inflation pipeline pressures intensify: February's PPI acceleration to +0.7% m/m (more than double consensus) was the largest monthly gain since July 2025. The Philly Fed Manufacturing Survey's prices paid component rose to 44.7 from 38.9, while prices received increased to 21.2 from 16.7, confirming that input cost pressures — particularly energy-related — are broadening across the manufacturing sector. With WTI crude holding near $98/barrel and Brent above $108, energy's contribution to both headline and core inflation measures will likely intensify in the coming months. The University of Michigan's preliminary March consumer sentiment reading of 55.5 included elevated inflation expectations, though the final reading is scheduled for March 27.

Labor market sends mixed signals: Initial jobless claims fell to 205,000, well below the 215,000 consensus and the lowest level in several weeks. This suggests the February payrolls loss of 92,000 — covered in our March 8 report — may have been an outlier rather than the start of a broader deterioration. However, continuing claims edged to 1.857 million, indicating that while initial layoffs remain low, job-finding rates may be moderating. The Philly Fed's employment index remained positive at 18.1, well above consensus, suggesting regional manufacturing employment continues to expand.

Housing data disrupted: The Census Bureau postponed its February housing starts and building permits release to April 29, citing data processing issues. The NAHB Housing Market Index improved modestly to 38 from 37, but remained well below the 50 threshold that separates builder optimism from pessimism. With mortgage rates elevated and construction material costs rising, the housing sector remains a significant headwind to broader economic growth.

Federal Reserve Policy Outlook — FOMC March 2026 Decision Implications

The March FOMC meeting represented a decisive shift in the Committee's risk assessment. By raising the 2026 core PCE forecast to 2.7% from 2.5% while acknowledging Middle East uncertainty for the first time in an official statement, the Fed signaled that it views the current inflation impulse — driven by energy costs, tariff pass-through, and resilient demand — as more persistent than previously anticipated. The GDP growth forecast was modestly upgraded to 2.4%, while the longer-run neutral rate estimate edged to 3.0%, reinforcing the structural case for higher policy rates.

The dot plot mechanics deserve close attention. While the median still shows one cut in 2026, Powell noted that several participants shifted from two cuts to one, and seven of 19 now project no cuts this year. The market's response — pricing zero cuts through year-end — went further than the Committee's central tendency, reflecting a view that the balance of risks has shifted definitively toward higher-for-longer. Governor Waller's Friday revelation that the oil shock reversed his inclination to dissent for a cut illustrates how rapidly the policy calculus has shifted since the Iran conflict began on February 28. The contrast with the January FOMC meeting, when the Committee maintained a more balanced stance — as analyzed in our February 1 FOMC review — underscores the speed of this policy recalibration.

Iran Conflict and Energy Markets — Strait of Hormuz Impact

The US-Israeli military campaign against Iran, now in its third week, continued to dominate cross-asset risk sentiment. The Strait of Hormuz — through which approximately 20% of global oil supply transits — has been effectively closed since early March, creating the most significant energy supply disruption since the 1970s. This week's developments included reported Israeli strikes on Iran's South Pars gas field and a retaliatory Iranian attack on Qatar's Ras Laffan LNG facility. On Friday, reports of Pentagon preparations for potential ground operations and consideration of seizing Iran's Kharg Island oil export hub added to market uncertainty.

WTI crude closed the week near $98/barrel, with Brent above $108. Analysts at several major banks have warned that a prolonged closure could push Brent toward previous cycle highs. The IEA coordinated a historic emergency release from 32 member countries, with the US committing 172 million barrels from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. For fixed income markets, the primary transmission mechanism runs through inflation expectations: 5-year breakeven inflation rates have risen materially since the conflict began, compressing real yields less than nominal yields have risen and adding to the term premium embedded in longer-duration bonds.

Global Central Bank Convergence

In an unusual convergence, the Fed, ECB, Bank of England, and Bank of Japan all delivered rate decisions within a 24-hour window — and none cut rates. The ECB held at 2.00%, raising its 2026 inflation forecast to 2.6% and citing Middle East energy risks. The Bank of England held at 3.75% unanimously, warning that CPI could run between 3.0–3.5% over the coming quarters. The Bank of Japan held at 0.75%, rejecting a proposal to hike to 1.0% in an 8–1 vote. This synchronized hold marks a clear end to the global easing cycle that characterized late 2024 and 2025, with policy divergence now centered on which central banks may need to tighten further rather than how quickly to ease.

Week Ahead: PCE Inflation and Iran Developments

  • Trump Iran Ultimatum Deadline (Monday, March 23): The President's threat to escalate strikes if the Strait of Hormuz is not reopened within 48 hours expires Monday. The resolution or escalation of this standoff will likely set the tone for energy markets and broader risk sentiment throughout the week.
  • Existing Home Sales (Tuesday, March 24): February data expected to show continued pressure from elevated mortgage rates. Any meaningful decline would reinforce the housing sector's sensitivity to the higher-rate environment.
  • Durable Goods Orders (Wednesday, March 25): February data will provide a read on business investment intentions amid trade policy uncertainty and rising input costs.
  • Final Q4 2025 GDP Revision (Thursday, March 26): The third revision to Q4 GDP could confirm whether the preliminary 0.7% reading — a notable deceleration from prior quarters — will be revised further.
  • February PCE Price Index (Friday, March 27): The Fed's preferred inflation measure arrives with heightened significance given this week's hot PPI data and the FOMC's revised projections. A core PCE reading above 0.3% m/m would further validate the Committee's hawkish shift and likely push rate-cut expectations even further out.

US Economic Positioning and Global Context

The US economy enters a challenging phase where multiple headwinds converge. The combination of fiscal deficits now exceeding $1.9 trillion annually (with gross national debt surpassing $39 trillion for the first time on March 17), the Iran-driven energy shock, and ongoing trade policy uncertainty — including the USTR's new Section 301 investigations targeting 60 trading partners — creates a complex backdrop for fixed income markets. The government sold $606 billion in Treasury securities across nine auctions during the week, underscoring the relentless pace of issuance that competes with private credit for investor capital.

The dollar weakened modestly despite the geopolitical environment, with the DXY index declining approximately 1% to near 99.50, as hawkish pivots from the ECB and BOE reduced the US rate advantage relative to peers. For fixed income allocators, the 30-year yield at the 98th percentile of its 5-year range reflects the combination of these structural forces: persistent inflation risk, elevated supply, and the growing term premium that investors demand for duration exposure in an uncertain environment. The question for the coming weeks is whether the economic data — particularly next Friday's PCE report — will confirm the inflationary trajectory the FOMC has projected, or whether the growth slowdown (Q4 GDP at 0.7%) will reassert itself as the dominant narrative.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the FOMC decide at its March 2026 meeting?

The Federal Reserve held the federal funds rate at 3.50–3.75% in an 11–1 vote at its March 17–18 meeting. The Committee raised its 2026 PCE inflation forecast to 2.7% from 2.4% and maintained a median projection of one 25bp cut this year, though seven of 19 participants now see no cuts in 2026. Chair Powell acknowledged inflation progress has fallen short of expectations.

Why did Treasury yields rise after the FOMC March 2026 rate decision?

Treasury yields rose because the FOMC's inflation forecast upgrade, combined with a hotter-than-expected February PPI report (+0.7% vs. +0.3% consensus), caused bond markets to reprice the entire 2026 rate path. By Friday, fed funds futures showed zero cuts priced for 2026, driving the 2-year yield above the effective fed funds rate for the first time since November 2023.

How is the Iran oil shock affecting fixed income markets in March 2026?

The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has pushed Brent crude above $108/barrel, creating persistent upward pressure on inflation expectations. This energy shock directly influenced the Fed's revised inflation forecast and contributed to the removal of rate-cut pricing from futures markets. The supply disruption is being described as the most significant since the 1970s Arab oil embargo.

What are the current credit spread levels as of March 2026?

As of March 20, 2026, investment grade OAS stood at approximately 92 basis points (58th percentile of the 5-year range) and high yield OAS at approximately 320 basis points (42nd percentile). While spreads have widened from the historic tights of late January 2026, they remain within the middle of their historical distribution, suggesting credit markets have not yet fully priced the cumulative impact of the oil shock and tighter monetary policy.

Key Articles of the Week

  • Prior Week's Report: FOMC March 2026 Preview — GDP Slows as 30-Year Treasury Nears 5%
    Mariemont Capital
    March 15, 2026
    Read Article →
  • Federal Reserve Issues FOMC Statement — March 18, 2026
    Federal Reserve Board
    March 18, 2026
    Read Article →
  • Fed Interest Rate Decision March 2026: Holds Rates Steady
    CNBC
    March 18, 2026
    Read Article →
  • Fed Meeting Recap: Powell Says Inflation Isn't Coming Down as Much as Hoped
    CNBC
    March 18, 2026
    Read Article →
  • Treasury Yields Trade Higher After Fed Holds Rates
    CNBC
    March 18, 2026
    Read Article →
  • Bond Traders Scrap 2026 Fed Cut Bets as Oil Surge Fuels Inflation Fears
    Bloomberg
    March 20, 2026
    Read Article →
  • ECB, BOE, Swiss National Bank, Riksbank Interest Rate Decisions
    CNBC
    March 19, 2026
    Read Article →
  • US Furiously Seeks to Avert Potential Monthslong Closure of Strait of Hormuz
    CNN
    March 20, 2026
    Read Article →
Content Produced By:
Justin Taylor

Important Disclaimer

This report is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation to buy or sell any security, or a solicitation of any kind. The information contained herein is believed to be reliable but cannot be guaranteed as to its accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

The analysis and opinions expressed in this report are those of Mariemont Capital and are subject to change without notice. Market conditions, economic factors, and investment strategies evolve continuously, and the views expressed herein may not reflect current conditions or opinions at a later date.

No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the fairness, accuracy, completeness, or correctness of the information and opinions contained herein. Mariemont Capital and its affiliates, officers, directors, and employees may have positions in the securities mentioned in this report and may make purchases or sales while this report is in circulation.

Investing in fixed income securities involves risks, including interest rate risk, credit risk, inflation risk, reinvestment risk, and liquidity risk. The value of investments can go down as well as up, and investors may not get back the amount originally invested. This report should not be relied upon as the sole basis for investment decisions. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and consult with qualified financial, legal, and tax advisors before making any investment.

This report may not be reproduced, distributed, or published without the prior written consent of Mariemont Capital. By accessing this report, you acknowledge and agree to be bound by the terms of this disclaimer.

Sources: Available upon request to jt@mariemontcapital.com
Data extracted from public and private data sources.
© 2026 Mariemont Capital. All rights reserved.
Published: Sunday, March 22, 2026, 6:30 PM EST