Trump Greenland Tariffs Treasury Yields: 30-Year Hits 4.92%

Greenland arctic landscape reflecting Trump tariff threats that sent 30-year Treasury yields to 4.92% in January 2026
Trump Greenland Tariffs Treasury Yields: 30-Year Approaches 5% Before Recovery – Week Ending January 25, 2026 | Mariemont Capital

Duration & Credit Pulse

Week Ending January 25, 2026

Executive Summary

Bottom Line: Trump's Greenland tariff threats and Japan's government bond selloff created notable intraweek volatility, with the 30-year Treasury yield briefly touching 4.92%—its highest since August 2025—before both risks de-escalated and markets stabilized. Despite the turbulence, weekly Treasury changes were minimal: the 10-year yield finished essentially flat at 4.23% while credit spreads remained at historically tight levels, with both IG (69 bp) and HY (239 bp) OAS at just the 3rd percentile of their 5-year ranges. The week demonstrated fixed income markets' resilience to geopolitical and fiscal shocks while highlighting sensitivity to sovereign debt concerns and trade policy uncertainty.

Duration Dashboard: Trump Greenland Tariffs and Treasury Yields

MaturityJan 16, 2026Jan 23, 2026Weekly Δ5-Year Percentile
2‑Year 3.59% 3.60% +1 bp 40th %ile (middle range)
5‑Year 3.82% 3.83% +1 bp 54th %ile (middle range)
10‑Year 4.22% 4.23% 0 bp 72nd %ile (middle range)
30‑Year 4.84% 4.83% −1 bp 90th %ile (elevated)

Yield Curve Stability Masks Intraweek Volatility

3.4% 3.8% 4.2% 4.6% 5.0% 2Y 5Y 10Y 30Y Modest Weekly Flattening Despite Tuesday Spike 3.60% 3.83% 4.23% 4.83% Jan 16, 2026 Jan 23, 2026

Curve Analysis: The yield curve experienced modest flattening, with the 2s30s spread narrowing 2 basis points to 123bp as short-end yields rose while long bonds rallied into the close. The muted weekly changes mask substantial intraweek volatility—the 30-year yield spiked 8bp to 4.92% on January 20 during the simultaneous Greenland tariff threats and Japan bond selloff before recovering as both risks dissipated. The 10-year traded in a 7bp range (4.22%-4.29%) but closed essentially unchanged, suggesting markets ultimately viewed the week's disruptions as temporary rather than structural.

Treasury markets absorbed concurrent pressures from President Trump's announcement of 10% tariffs on eight European nations tied to Greenland acquisition demands and Japan's most severe government bond selloff since 1999. The 30-year yield briefly touched 4.92% on January 20—approaching the psychologically significant 5% threshold—before retreating as Trump announced a "framework" deal with NATO and the Bank of Japan held rates at 0.75%. The $13 billion 20-year bond auction on January 22 provided crucial stabilization, awarding at 4.846%—approximately 1 basis point through the when-issued yield—demonstrating continued appetite for duration at elevated yield levels.

Japan Contagion Pathway: The catalyst for Tuesday's selloff originated in Tokyo, where Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's surprise snap election announcement and proposed ¥5 trillion tax suspension sent 40-year JGB yields to record highs above 4.2%. Japan's 240% debt-to-GDP ratio—highest among developed nations—amplified fiscal credibility concerns. The transmission to US Treasuries was swift, as Japanese institutions holding approximately $1.2 trillion in Treasuries appeared to reduce duration exposure. The Bank of Japan's January 23 decision to hold rates at 0.75% provided stabilization, though Governor Ueda indicated willingness for "nimble" responses to yield volatility.

Credit Spreads Remain Historically Tight Despite VIX Spike

MetricJan 16, 2026Jan 23, 2026Weekly Δ5-Year Percentile
IG OAS 71 bp 69 bp −2 bp 3rd %ile (extremely tight)
HY OAS 235 bp 239 bp +4 bp 3rd %ile (extremely tight)
VIX Index 15.86 16.09 +0.23 31st %ile (middle range)

Credit markets displayed notable resilience, with investment grade spreads actually tightening 2bp to 69bp despite the week's volatility—remaining at just the 3rd percentile of the 5-year range. High yield widened modestly by 4bp to 239bp but also sits at the 3rd percentile, reflecting historically compressed risk premiums. Strong technical support from robust primary issuance—year-to-date IG supply is tracking toward a potential record $2.25 trillion annual pace—and persistent institutional demand helped absorb the week's volatility. The VIX spiked to 20.09 on January 20 during peak stress but retreated to 16.09 by week's end.

Spread Compression at Extremes: Both IG and HY spreads remain at the 3rd percentile of their 5-year distributions—levels that offer minimal cushion against credit deterioration. The week's resilience in spreads despite significant rate volatility reflects strong technical support from fund flows, record primary issuance absorption, and carry-seeking behavior. However, with tariffs creating margin pressures for trade-exposed sectors and the effective US tariff rate at 16.9% (highest since 1932), current spreads may inadequately compensate for fundamental risks. The brief disconnect between the VIX spike to 20.09 and credit stability warrants continued monitoring.

US Macroeconomic Assessment – Resilience Amid Policy Uncertainty

Economic data released during the week painted a picture of continued resilience despite elevated policy uncertainty. Initial jobless claims printed at 200,000—well below the 212,000 consensus—extending the pattern of historically low layoff activity. The labor market remains tight, providing a foundation for consumer spending even as tariff-related price pressures build. The University of Michigan consumer sentiment final reading for January improved to 71.1, though year-ahead inflation expectations remained elevated at 4.0%.

Housing sector sends mixed signals: Existing home sales climbed to 4.35 million SAAR—the highest pace since February 2023—benefiting from mortgage rates declining to 6.09%. However, pending home sales plunged 9.3% in December, the largest monthly decline since April 2020, suggesting the recent improvement may prove temporary. NAR Chief Economist Lawrence Yun noted that elevated mortgage rates continue to constrain activity despite improved sales.

Regional manufacturing rebounds: The Philadelphia Fed Manufacturing Index surprised strongly at +12.6 versus expectations of -4.5, while the Empire State Manufacturing Survey reached +7.7 against a +1.0 forecast. These readings suggest manufacturing activity is firming despite tariff uncertainty, though the January Fed Beige Book noted that cost pressures due to tariffs remained a consistent theme across all Districts.

Tariff landscape remains complex: The weighted average effective US tariff rate now stands at 16.9%—the highest since 1932. While Trump's Greenland-related tariffs were suspended following the NATO framework announcement, existing tariffs on China, Canada, and Mexico continue to generate price pressures. A pending Supreme Court ruling on IEEPA emergency tariff authority could reshape the administration's trade policy toolkit.

Federal Reserve Policy Outlook

The Federal Reserve enters its January 28-29 FOMC meeting with markets assigning approximately 95% probability to an unchanged rate decision. Fed funds futures price roughly 50 basis points of total cuts for 2026—down significantly from expectations entering the year—with the first reduction now expected in June. Vice Chair Philip Jefferson characterized current policy as "consistent with the neutral rate," while Kansas City Fed President Jeff Schmid highlighted tariff-related uncertainty as a key factor complicating the policy outlook.

The January Beige Book's emphasis on tariff-related cost pressures reinforces the FOMC's patient stance. With inflation remaining above target and labor markets still tight, the Committee faces limited urgency to ease. The week's rate volatility—particularly the 30-year's approach to 5%—may factor into discussions around balance sheet policy, though no changes are expected at the upcoming meeting.

Week Ahead: FOMC Decision and Q4 GDP

  • FOMC Rate Decision (January 29): Expected hold at 4.25-4.50%. Powell's press conference will be closely watched for guidance on the pace of future cuts and any commentary on tariff impacts to inflation expectations.
  • Q4 GDP Advance Estimate (January 30): Consensus expects approximately 2.5% annualized growth. Strength in consumer spending likely offset trade drag from pre-tariff import front-loading.
  • Core PCE Inflation (January 31): The Fed's preferred inflation measure for December. Any uptick would reinforce the case for extended policy patience.
  • ISM Manufacturing PMI (February 3): Following strong regional surveys, the national reading will indicate whether manufacturing resilience is broadening.
  • Nonfarm Payrolls (February 7): January employment report. Weather effects and seasonal adjustment challenges may create volatility.

Global Context and Fund Flow Dynamics

The week's events underscored how global sovereign debt concerns can rapidly transmit to US Treasuries. Japan's fiscal credibility questions—stemming from its 240% debt-to-GDP ratio and political uncertainty—created immediate selling pressure as Japanese institutions adjusted portfolios. The dollar index declined approximately 1.5% to the 97.5-98 range—its lowest level since December 2025—as markets briefly adopted a "sell America" posture amid Greenland-related tensions. While modest in scope, a Danish pension fund's public announcement of plans to exit Treasury holdings highlighted European sensitivity to US trade policy.

Fund flows remained constructive despite the volatility. Bond funds absorbed $23.4 billion for the week ending January 14, extending inflow streaks dating to April 2025. Municipal bonds attracted their strongest weekly inflows in 17 weeks, while inflation-protected securities saw their highest inflows in seven weeks. The CLO market continues to provide technical support, with record warehouse activity underpinning demand for leveraged loans. Primary corporate issuance maintained robust momentum, with year-to-date IG supply tracking toward a potential record $2.25 trillion annual pace.

Key Articles of the Week

  • Trump Says He Reached Greenland Deal 'Framework' With NATO, Backs Off Europe Tariffs
    CNBC
    January 21, 2026
    Read Article
  • Japan's Central Bank Holds Rates Steady After Bond Sell-Off and Ahead of Elections
    Euronews
    January 23, 2026
    Read Article
  • Japan 40-Year JGB Yield Hits Record Amid Fiscal Jitters and Snap Election Call
    CNBC
    January 20, 2026
    Read Article
  • NAR Pending Home Sales Report Shows 9.3% Decrease in December
    GlobeNewswire (National Association of Realtors)
    January 21, 2026
    Read Article
  • Speech by Vice Chair Jefferson on the Economic Outlook and Monetary Policy
    Federal Reserve Board
    January 16, 2026
    Read Article
  • Fed Beige Book: January 2026 National Summary
    Federal Reserve
    January 2026
    Read Article
  • The Economic Outlook and Monetary Policy
    Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (President Jeff Schmid)
    January 2026
    Read Article

Frequently Asked Questions

What caused the 30-year Treasury yield to spike to 4.92% on January 20?

The 30-year Treasury yield reached 4.92% due to a combination of two simultaneous shocks: President Trump's announcement of 10% tariffs on eight European nations tied to Greenland acquisition demands, and Japan's most severe government bond selloff since 1999 triggered by Prime Minister Takaichi's surprise snap election announcement and proposed tax suspension. Japanese institutions holding approximately $1.2 trillion in Treasuries appeared to reduce duration exposure, amplifying the selloff.

Why did the Federal Reserve hold rates steady at the January 2026 meeting?

The Fed maintained its policy rate at 4.25-4.50% because inflation remains above the 2% target while labor markets stay tight, removing urgency to ease. Vice Chair Jefferson described current policy as "consistent with the neutral rate." Additionally, tariff-related cost pressures noted across all Fed Districts in the Beige Book complicate the inflation outlook, supporting the Committee's patient approach.

How tight are credit spreads compared to historical levels?

Both investment grade (69 bp) and high yield (239 bp) option-adjusted spreads sit at just the 3rd percentile of their 5-year distributions—meaning spreads have been wider 97% of the time over the past five years. This extreme tightness offers minimal cushion against credit deterioration and may inadequately compensate for fundamental risks from tariff-related margin pressures.

What is the current weighted average US tariff rate?

The weighted average effective US tariff rate stands at 16.9%—the highest level since 1932. While Trump's Greenland-related tariffs on European nations were suspended following a NATO framework announcement, existing tariffs on China, Canada, and Mexico remain in effect. A pending Supreme Court ruling on IEEPA emergency tariff authority could reshape future trade policy implementation.

Content Produced By:
Justin Taylor, CFA

Important Disclaimer

This report is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation to buy or sell any security, or a solicitation of any kind. The information contained herein is believed to be reliable but cannot be guaranteed as to its accuracy or completeness. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

The analysis and opinions expressed in this report are those of Mariemont Capital and are subject to change without notice. Market conditions, economic factors, and investment strategies evolve continuously, and the views expressed herein may not reflect current conditions or opinions at a later date.

No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the fairness, accuracy, completeness, or correctness of the information and opinions contained herein. Mariemont Capital and its affiliates, officers, directors, and employees may have positions in the securities mentioned in this report and may make purchases or sales while this report is in circulation.

Investing in fixed income securities involves risks, including interest rate risk, credit risk, inflation risk, reinvestment risk, and liquidity risk. The value of investments can go down as well as up, and investors may not get back the amount originally invested. This report should not be relied upon as the sole basis for investment decisions. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and consult with qualified financial, legal, and tax advisors before making any investment.

This report may not be reproduced, distributed, or published without the prior written consent of Mariemont Capital. By accessing this report, you acknowledge and agree to be bound by the terms of this disclaimer.

Sources: Available upon request to jt@mariemontcapital.com
Data extracted from public and private data sources.
© 2026 Mariemont Capital. All rights reserved.
Published: Sunday, January 25, 2026, 6:30 PM EST